|
BOZEMAN
PASS WILDLIFE LINKAGE AND HIGHWAY SAFETY STUDY
April C. Craighead*,
Elizabeth A. Roberts^, and, F. Lance Craighead*.
*Craighead
Environmental Research Institute, 201 South Wallace Ave., Bozeman,
MT 59715. Phone: 406-585-8705. Fax: 406-585-8220. Email: Lance@grizzlybear.org.
^American Wildlands, 40 East Main Street, Bozeman MT 59715. Phone:
406-586-8175. Fax: 406-586-8242. Email: eroberts@wildlands.org
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
This paper
reports the results from the first field season and first model
iteration of the Bozeman Pass wildlife linkage and highway safety
study. This project was carried out by the Craighead Environmental
Research Institute (CERI) and was funded by the Henry P. Kendall
Foundation as a part of the Yellowstone to Yukon science program.
GIS analysis was provided by American Wildlands with support
from CERI. This paper was presented at the 4th Annual International
Conference on Ecology and Transportation and is published in
the proceedings of that conference (maps have been slightly modified
since that publication). Field research will continue throughout
2002 to include snow tracking and camera surveys, and a second
iteration of the models is also planned as additional funding
becomes available.
Potential wildlife movement habitat (corridors) were identified
using GIS least-cost-path models. The model results were compared
with field data consisting of roadkill locations. Results of
this analysis indicate that GIS least-cost-path models help to
identify locations where animals attempt to cross the highway.
The models can probably be improved by incorporating additional
data layers such as slope and man-made barriers to movement such
as fences or median (Jersey) barriers. In the absence of accurate
roadkill or track data, these models are useful to identify potential
crossing sites, and should be applicable across the Yellowstone
to Yukon region with appropriate modifications for local species
preferences. Once identified, the crossing site locations can
be inspected on the ground in order to determine whether crossing
structures such as underpasses or overpasses could be built.
ABSTRACT:
BOZEMAN PASS WILDLIFE LINKAGE AND HIGHWAY SAFETY STUDY
Large-scale
conservation efforts seek to maintain habitat connections so
that native wildlife (and plant) species may move across the
landscape as necessary to meet their needs to survive and reproduce.
Barriers caused by roads and railways pose a significant impediment
to wildlife movement at all scales throughout the U.S. Northern
Rockies area, and a risk of injury or death to animals whose
needs require crossing when traffic is present. In turn, animals
on highways pose a risk of injury or death to motorists and property
damage to vehicles. As traffic volumes increase, these risks
also increase.
Bozeman Pass is just beginning to experience significant conflicts
with wildlife. In addition to a four-lane freeway (Interstate
90) there are parallel frontage roads and a railway. As traffic
volumes continue to increase the problems will only get worse.
To plan for inevitable growth in human populations and traffic
volumes, and to fulfill the mandates of the Transportation Equity
Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) regarding wildlife needs and
public safety, it is imperative that options for wildlife conflict
mitigation be started as soon as possible on Bozeman Pass. This
study attempts to identify the problem?areas for wildlife and
human safety at Bozeman Pass and make recommendations about how
and where to mitigate wildlife mortality and human safety issues
in the connectivity zone. Several moose, mountain lions, black
bear, deer, elk, small mammals, and one wolf have been killed
by traffic within the past two years.
GIS models and maps have been developed for this project to summarize
location data for wildlife?vehicle collision, wildlife movement
corridors, wildlife habitat, and potential sites for wildlife
crossing structures. GIS models using least-cost-path analysis
were compared with the known locations of road-kills and model
predictions were close to actual crossing points. Differences
between the field data and the model data suggest that the models
can be improved by incorporating additional data layers and perhaps
by adjusting the weights of model variables.
Click here for the full report (pdf)
Bozeman Pass.pdf
Design
Recomendations For Bozeman Pass
|